Melancholia: A History of Diagnosis and Treatment
Jakarta, Indonesia, July 1, 1996
Thomas A. Ban
Table 1
DESCRIPTION OF MELANCHOLIA
OLD TESTAMENT BOOK OF JOB HOMER'S ILLIAD
"IF WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WE CAN STILL
TALK AND MOST LIKELY TALK VOLUBLY BUT THERE IS SMALL CHANCE THAT WE ARE TALKING TO A DEFINITE POINT" (Wilson 1932:Amer J Cancer)
Table 2
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FINDINGS
COHEN & FAIRBANK 1938 0.80%
LEMKAU & AL 1941 0.90%
LIN 1952 0.40%
EATON & WEIL 1955 0.80%
Imipramine-Kuhn-1957
LEIGHTON & AL 1963 7.50%
BLUMENTHAL & DIELMAN 1975 13.00%
VAISANEN 1975 7.50%
WEISSMAN & MYERS 1978 6.50%
Point Prevalence (DSM-IVTM 1999)
MDD 1999 4.75%
DYSTHYMIA 1999 3.00%
Table 3
MELANCHOLIA
RECURRENT EPISODIC
30%-35$ CHRONIC
SYMPTOMS
Manifestations Depth of Depression
Clinical Features None Mild Moderate Severe
% % % %
STOOPED POSTURE 6 32 70 98
DIURNAL VARIATION 6 13 37 37
SUICIDAL IDEAS 12 47 73 94
SADNESS 16 72 94 94
LOSS OF APPETITE 17 33 61 88
INDECISIVENESS 18 42 68 83
FEELING INADEQUATE 25 56 75 90
SLOWED SPEECH 25 53 72 75
GUILT FEELINGS 27 46 64 60
LOSS OF LIBIDO 27 38 58 61
SLEEP DISTURBANCE 31 55 73 88
LOW SELF-ESTEEM 38 60 78 81
FATIGABILITY 39 62 89 84
SELF-BLAME 43 67 80 80
Table 4
1957 - 1999 UK POPULATION ON ANTIDEPRESSANTS 3%
1996 - 2000 CANADA: PRESCRIPTION OF ADS INCREASED +62%
1999 5TH LEADING CAUSE OF DISABILITY
2020 2ND LEADING CAUSE OF DISABILITY
UNDERTREATED INCREASE OF PRESCRIPTIONS OF ADS
Canada 1994-1999
Point prevalence 2.4% - 1.9%
Antidepressants 18.2% - 32.6%
1 OF 3 RESPONDS TO ADS
Table 5
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DIAGNOSES
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENTS
COMPOSITE DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF DD
Table 6
HIPPOCRATES 4th BC. MANIA ACUTE MENTAL DISTURBANCES
MELANCHOLIA CHRONIC MENTAL DISTURBANCES
CELSUS 1st AC. MELANCHOLIA SADNESS-MELANCHOLIA
ARETAEUS 1st AC. MELANCHOLIA EPISODIC: ALTERNATES WITH
MANIA
GALEN 2nd AC. ON MELANCHOLY ILLNESS vs TEMPERAMENT
SYMPTOMS FOLLOW ILLNESS LIKE SHADOW ITS SUBSTANCE
Forms: General M Brain M Hypochondriacal M
Causes: Black bile, Yellow bile, Dietary, Emotional
Suppression of hemorrhoidal flux
Suppression of menstrual flux
Table 7
AURELIANUS 5th Melancholia MENTAL ANGUISH & DISTRESS
WITH DEJECTION, SILENCE,
ANIMOSITY, LONGING FOR
DEATH, SUSPICION &
WEEPING
TIMOTHY BRIGHT 16th TREATISE
of
MELANCHOLIA
NATURAL M UNNATURAL M
Galenic temperament Severe mental disorder
Sad and gloomy disposition, vague Insanity
feelings of sulliness, irritabilty Violent disorderly passions
moodiness, and oddities of conduct
Table 8
SYDENHAM 17th From syndromes to disease
BOISSIER DE SAUVAGES 18th M: Disorders of Intellect
CULLEN 18th VESANIAS
Disorders of Judgement
AMENTIA Inbeciltiy of Judgement
MELANCHOLIA Partial distortion of reality
MANIA Universal distortion of reality
CHIARUGI 18th MELANCHOLIA MANIA AMENTIA
True (sad)
False (happy)
Violent
PINEL 18th MELANCHOLIA MANIA AMENTIA
Table 9
REID (1764) FACULTY PSYCHOLOGY
Intellect, Emotion, Volition
HEINROTH (1818)
MELANCHOLIA: PARTIAL INSANITY
FACULTIES EXALTATIONS DEPRESSIONS MIXED
Intellect Paranoia Dementia Confusion
EMOTION Insanity MELANCHOLIA DELUSIONAL M
Volition Manai Abulia Angst
Table 10
PINEL (1798, 1801) ESQUIROL (1838)
MELANCHOLIA LYPEMANIA
Delirium about Sad mood affects
one subject thinking,feeling
exclusively & will
MANIA WITHOUT DELIRIUM MONOMANIA
Intellectual
Affective
Instinctual
MANIA WITH DELIRIUM MANIA
DEMENTIA DEMENTIA
IDIOTISM IMBECILITY
Table 11
GRIESINGER (1845, 1861)
STATES OF MENTAL DEPRESSIONS
Hypochondriasis
Melancholia in a limited sense
Melancholia with stupor
Melancholia with destructive tendencies
Murderous homicidal
Murderous suicidal
Melancholia with persistent excitement of the will STATES OF MENTAL EXALTATION
Monomania
Mania
STATES OF MENTAL WEAKNESS
Table 12
KAHLBAUM 1863 VECORDIA DYSTHYMIA
KRAEPELIN 1891 MELANCHOLIA MELANCHOLIA
Periodic P Depressive
Delusional P Depressive
1896 INVOLUTIONAL P INVOLUTIONAL M
Periodic P Depressive
1899 INVOLUTIONAL P INVOLUTIONAL M
MD Insanity Depressive States
1904 MD Insanity
1904 MD Insanity
Table 13
UNITARY CONCEPT OF MELANCHOLIA
Kraepelin 1891 Mapother 1926 Lewis 1934
AUTHOR YEAR SYNDROMES
Hamilton&White 1959 RETARDED AGITATED
Kiloh&Garside 1963 ENDOGENOUS NEUROTIC
Plowsky et al 1969 ENDOGENOUS NEUROTIC
Foulds 1976 PSYCHOTIC NEUROTIC DYSTHYMIC
Overall et al 1966 ANXIOUS HOSTILE RETARDED
Wing et al 1974 PSYCHOTIC ANXIOUS HOSTILE
Paykel 1971 PSYCHOTIC NEUROTIC ENDOGENOUS
YOUNGWITH PERSONALITY
DISORDER
Raskin et al 1976 ENDOGENOUSAGINOUS POOR PREMORBID
PERSONALITY
Table 14
KRAEPELIN'S UNITARY CONCEPT 1904
SYMPTOMATIC ENDOGENOUS PSYCHOGENIC
Bonnhoeffer Moebius Wimmer
1910 1900 1916
DEPRESSIVE PSYCHOPATHY VITAL DEPRESSION REACTIVE DEPRESSION Schneider 1920, 1958
LEONHARD
1957
UNIPOLAR BIPOLAR
Pure Melancholia
Pure Depressions
Non-participatory
Harried
Hypochondriacal
Self-torturing
Suspicious
Table 15
KKRAEPELIN 1891 THOUGHT RETARDATION
DECREASED DRIVE
SCHNEIDER 1920 CORPORISATION
FEELING OF LOSS OF VITALITY
BERNER ET AL 1983 DIURNAL VARIATION
SLEEP DISTURBANCE
Table 16
ADOLF MEYER 1908 (1952)
Spectrum of Affective Reactions
Replaced Melancholia with Depression
Assigned Depressions to Hypothermergasias
ROBINS & GUZE 1972
PRIMARY SECONDARY
SPITZER ET AL 1978
MAJOR MINOR
DSM-III (1980) - DSM-IV (1994)
MAJOR DEPRESSION DYSTHYMIA
LOSS OF PLEASURE DEPRESSSED MOOD Disturbance of Concentration Feelings of Guilt
Suicidal Ideation Disturbed Sleep
Loss of Appetite Retardation/ Agitation
Covered Up
Component diagnoses & Treatment responsive forms of illness
TABLE 17
DEPRESSED MOOD
LOSS OF INTEREST/ENJOYMENT/PLEASURE
(INCREASED FATIGABILITY/LOSS OF ENERGY)
REDUCED CONCENTRATION/ATTENTION/THINKING
IDEAS OF GUILT/UNWORTHINESS
IDEAS OR ACTS OF SELF-HARM OR SUICIDE
DISTURBED SLEEP
DIMINISHED APPETITE
Reduced Self-esteem Confidence (ICD-10)
Bleak Pessimistic Views of the Future (ICD-10)
Psychomotor Retardation or Agitation (DSM-IV)
ICD-10= 2+ typical & at least 2 of 3 other; 5 specifiers
DSM-IV= 5+ other with at least 1 of 2 typical; 15 specifiers
TABLE 18
FROM DSM-III TO DSM-IV
MAJOR DEPRESSION
More Severe
Less Prolonged
DYSTHYMIA
Less Severe
More Prolonged
CONSENSUS BASED DIAGNOSES
Component Diagnoses Covered Up (Vital Depression) Treatment Responsive Forms of Illness Covered Up
Table 19
SAMUEL TUKE 1813
York Retreat 30 Patients
MEDICAL & MORAL TREATMENT 70% Response Rate
Warm Bath & Physical Exercise (65% recovery)
RAVINDRAN & AL 1999
Sertraline & Gognitive Therapy 71% Response Rate
KELLER ET AL 2000
Nefazodone & Cognitive Behavioral Analysis 85% Response Rate
Table 20
POPPY
Papaver Somniforum
PARACELSUS 1493-1541 LAUDANUM (elixir-arcanum)
ALBRECHT von HALLER 1708-1777 OPIUM (analgesic & soporofic)
OPIUM CURE: 1890-1957
3 Weeks: 3-25 Minims= 50% Discharged
ECT
Dinitrile Succinate (Gillis and Salfield 1953)
Hematoprophyrin (Bruel 1957)
Reserpine (Davies and Shepherd 1955)
Table 21
CHLORPROMAZINE
Anticholinergic Phenothiazines
Levomepromazine (Ban & Schwarz 1963)
Thioridazine (Overall et al 1966)
ANTIDEPRESSANTS 1957
IMIPRAMINE Kuhn TA-MAUI
IPRONIAZID Loomers et al -MAOI
SPECTROPHOTOFLUORIMETER
RESERPINE Decr.NE/5-HT DYSPHORIA
IPONIAZID Incr.NE/5-HT EUPHORIA
TABLE 22
MAOIs
ESSENTIAL HYDROXYLATION CEREBRAL
AMINO ACIDS DECARBOXYLATION MONOAMINES
Phenylalanine NE
Tryptophan 5-HT
MONOAMINES MAO OXIDATIVE DEAMINATION
Pugh&Quastel,Blaschko et al 1937
IPRONIAZID MAOI
Zeller et al 1952
SPECTROPHOTOFLUORIMETER
Pletscher, Brodie, Carlsson, Shore, Beckmann
RESERPINE Hollister DYSPHORIA
IPRONIAZID Selikoff et al EUPHORIA
Table 23
IPRONIAZID MAOI isopropyl derivative Crane 1957
Loomers et al 1957
ISONIAZID Non-MAOI Delay et al 1952
Salzer&Lurie 1953
IPRONIAZID hepatotoxicity
PHENIPRAZINE hepatotoxicity
TRANYLCYPROMINE hypertensive crises
Atypical Depression
Hysteroid features, hypersomnia, excessive appetite
Type A Clorgylene Youdim
Type B Deprenyl Knoll
PHENELZINE TRANYLCYPROMINE MOCLOBEMIDE
Table 24
MAUIs
IMIPRAMINE
Kuhn 1957; Klerman & Cole 1965
23STS 1009PTS 550IMI 459PBO 65%IMI2of3 PBO35%1of2
Domenjoz & Theobald 1959
Antihistaminic Anticholinergic Noradrenergic Serotonergic
Costa et al 1960
IMIPRAMINE REVERSED RESERPINE INDUCED
sedation, hypothermia, ptosis, diarrhea
AMPT - DESIPRAMINE
CONFOUNDING
RESERPINE REVERSAL WITH ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECT
ACTION MECHANISM OF THE DRUG WITH PATHOMECHANISM OF THE ILLNESS
Table 25
SSRIs
VETULANI 1975 intact 5-HT system Beta-adrenergic receptor
down-regulation
SHOPSIN 1976 PCPA Reverses effects of IMI
LANGER 1980 IMI & 5-HT binding Hypothalamus of rat
sites
PAUL 1980 IMI & 5-HT binding Human platelet
STIMULATION of 5-HT2A COMPENSATORY DECLINE OF DA
Imduce insomnia, reduce appetite, interfere with sexual functioning irritability, anxiety akathisia with suicidal/homicidal
NEW DRUGS
VENLAFAXINE SNRI-SE
(NEFAZODONE SeSSA)
(MIRTAZEPINE NaSSA)
SNRI-NA/SE NARI SSRI NaSSA/SeSSA MAOI/MAOI-A SePr
TABLE 26
22 ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN CANADA
SNRI-NA AMITRIPTYLINE/IMIPRAMINE/AMOXEPINE/
DOXEPIN
SNRI-SE CLOMIPRAMINE/VENLAFAXINE
NARI DESIPRAMINE/MAPROTILINE/NORTRIPTYLINE
SSRI FLUOXETINE/PAROXETINE/FLUVOXAMINE/ SERTRALINE
NaSSA TRIMEPRAMINE/(MIRTAZEPINE)
SeSSA TRAZODONE/(NEFAZODONE)
MAOI PHENELZINE/TRANYLCYPROMINE
MAOI-A MOCLOBEMIDE
NDRI BUPROPION
SePr L'TRYPTOPHAN
Table 27
DRUGS RESPONSE RATES %
NAME CLASS DRUG PLACEBO
Sertraline SSRI 79 48
Imipramine NSRI-NA 68 40
Fluvoxamine SSRI 67 39
Amoxapine NSRI-NA 67 49
Phenelzine MAOI 64 30
Moclobemide MAOI-A 64 24
Fluoxetine SSRI 60 33
Amitriptyline NSRI-NA 60 25
(Mirtazepine NaSSA 48 20)
Paroxetine SSRI 45 23
Response rates (HAMD 50%). Meta analyses of
Davis et al 1993
TABLE 28
SIDE EFFECTS WEIGHTED EVENT RATE
SSRI TCA
% %
Agitation 14 8
Anxiety 13 7
Constipation 10 22
Diarrhea 13 5
Dizziness 13 23
Dry mouth 21 55
Headache 17 14
Insomnia 12 7
Nausea 22 12
Nervousness 15 11
Based on Trinade and Menon 1997
RESPONSIVENESS TO A SECOND STRUCTURALLY & PHARMACOLOGICALLY
DIFFERENT ANTIDEPESSANT IS ENCOUNTEED MORE FREQUENTLY THAN
IT COULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY CHANCE/PLACEBO EFFECT
TABLE 29
EACH DRUG HAS ITS OWN IDENTITY
Chemical Structure
Pharmacological Profile
THERAPEUTIC PROFILE
No Information
RESPONSIVENESS TO A SECOND STRUCTURALLY &
PHARMACOLOGICALLY DIFFERENT ANTIDEPRESSANT
IS ENCOUNTERED MORE FREQUENTLY THAN IT
COULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY CHANCE/PLACEBO
EFFECT
TABLE 30
PHARMACOTHERAPY WITH ADs FOCUSSED ATTENTION ON THE
PHARMACOLOGICAL HETREOGENEITY OF DEPRESSIVE ILLNESS
ATTEMPTSTO RESOLVE HETEROGENEITY INCONSISTENT RESULTS
Linear Regression Equation
Biological Markers
Pharmacological Load Tests
Biochemical Indicators
KIELHOLZ 1968 Secondary Amines Motor Retardation
Tertiary Amines
POTTER 1985 MHPG NARI
5-HIAA SSRI
Desipramine/Zimelidine Lowers Both
TABLE 31
DRUGS RESPONSE RATES IC50 Value (nM)
5-HT NE
AMITRIPTYLINE 60 100 25
AMOXAPINE 67 600 25
FLUOXETINE 60 15 200
FLUVOXAMINE 67 5 500
IMIPRAMINE 68 50 25
PAROXETINE 45 1 70
SERTRALINE 79 4 300
Adopted from Ban 1999
THE SAME PATIENT TEND TO RESPOND IN
DIFFERENT EPISODES TO THE SAME DRUG
TABLE 32
THE INFORMATION GENERATED WITH THE METHODOLOGY
FOCUSSED ON THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY COVERED UP THE
POSSIBLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ANTIDEPRESSANTS
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN THE DEMONSTRATION
OF THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS OF IMIPRAMINE
DUE TO LACK OF SENSITIVE INSTRUMENTS
IN EFFICACY THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
HETEROGENEITY OF THE DEPRESSIVE POPULATION
AND RESPONSIVENESS TO TREATMENT IS EXPRESSED
TO DEVELOP INSTRUMENTS WHICH ARE SENSITIVE FOR
CHANGES IN SEVERITY OF SYMPTOMS & RELIABLE
CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC END-POINTS
Pharmaceutical Industry
Practicing Psychiatrists
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FOR IDENTIFYING THE TREATMENT
RESPONSIVE FORMS OF ILLNESS IN THE VAST DATA BASES
TABLE 33
OBSTACLES
Consensus Based Classifications
THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE DSM-III WAS THE CREATION OF A
COMMON LANGUAGE AND NOT THE PROVISION OF DIAGNOSTIC END-
POINTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
TO ACCOMODATE THE DIFFERENT ORIENTATIONS IN PSYCHIATRY THE
DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORIES ARE BROAD AND BY ACCOMODATING THE DIF-
FERENT FORMS OF DISEASE IN A LIMITED NUMBER OF DIAGNOSES THE
DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORIES ARE HETEROGENOUS AND THEIR PREDICTIVE
VALIDITY IS LOW
RAPID SUCCESS: RELIABLE CLINICAL END-POINTS FOR CLINICAL DRUG
DEVELOPMENT & FOR THE COMMUNICATION OF APPROVED
INDICATIONS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS
Sensitised Rating Scales
RATING SCALES CAN BE SENSITISED BY THE OMISSION OF SYMPTOMS
WHICH ARE NOT INFLUENCED BY TREATMENT OR RETAINING ONLY ITEMS
WHICH SHOW THE LARGEST CHANGES
SENSITIVE SCALES HELP TO DEMONSTRATE THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS
IN THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME IN THE SMALLEST NUMBER OF
PATIENTS BUT PRECLUDES THE POSSIBILITY OF FINDING ANY RELEVANT INFORMAT-ION IN THE VAST DATA BASES BY META-ANALYSES
TABLE 34
TO BREAK THE IMPASSE IN IMPROVING THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS
THERE IS A NEED FOR A SHIFT IN EMPHASIS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
FROM THE DEMONSTRATION OF THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY TO THE IDEN-
TIFICATION OF THE TREATMENT RESPONSIVE FORMS OF ILLNESS
CONSENSUS-BASED DIAGNOSTIC END-POINTS AND SENSITIVE SCALES
NEED TO BE SUPPLEMENTED/REPLACED BY COMPOSITE DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATIONS & COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHOPATHOLOGIC CHECK LISTS
Table 35
SHIFT EMPHASIS FROM EFFICACY TO IDENTIFICATION OF TREATMENT
RESPONSIVE FORMS OF ILLNESS
CODE SYSTEM
SET OF DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENTS WHICH BY SPECIALLY DEVISED
ALGORITHMS CAN ASSIGN A DIAGNOSIS FROM SEVERAL DIAGNOSTIC
SYSTEMS SIMULTANOUSLY
CODE-DD
EACH CODE CONSISTS OF: SET OF SYMPTOMS 90
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW
DIAGNOSTIC DECISION TREES 25
TABLE 36
CODE-DD
RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIVE DIAGNOSES 90 ITEMS
RS F ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF DD 40 ITEMS
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW 90
DECISION TREES 25
1. KRAEPELIN 1891
2. SCHNEIDER 1920
3. LEONHARD 1957
15. PAYKEL 1971
23. BERNER 1983
25. CDC 1989
COMPLETED: 30-40 MINUTES WITH OR WITHOUT COMPUTER PROMPTING
RELIABILITY-MEDIAN ITEM AGREEMENT: 87.8% 1st Study
100.0% 2nd Sudy
100.0% 3rd Study
Overall Kappa coefficient of 1.00
Table 37
DSM-III-R MAJOR DEPRESSION IS A BROAD & HETEROGENOUS DG CATEGORY
1. Number and % of 230 patients with the dg. of MD who could not be classified as depressed
VRC 77 33.5%
KDS 54 23.5%
LEONHARD 41 17.8%
HAMILTTON 36 15.7%
RDC 31 13.5%
OVERALL 31 13.5%
2. Depressive illness: unmotivated depressed mood, depressive evaluations and lack of reactive mood changes (N=322)
DEFINITE: 119 (37%) PROBABLE: 91 (28.2%) POSSIBLE: 61 (19%)
15.8%-63.0% iatrogenic
3. KDS: depressed mood, motor retardation & thought retardation
SVD: unmotivated depr mood, corporization, loss of vitality
Less than 50% overlap between 2 diagnoesgs in 2 studies
Table 38
NOSOLOGIC HETEROGENEITY=PHARMACOLOGICAL HETEREOGENEITY
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY LINKS EFECT ONMENTAL ILLNESS & BRAIN STRUCTURES PROVIDES ANDBRIDGES GAP BETWEEN GENES & PSYCHIATRIC NDOSOLOGY
PRIMARY TARGETS OF ADS MOLECULAR STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN NEURONAL TRANSMISSION ENCODED BY GENESHICH HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TREATMENT RESPONSIVE POPULATION IS SUITABLE FOR THE GENERATION OF GENETIC HYPOTHESES WITH CANDIDATE GENE APPROACH
Table 39
1970 DEVELOPMENT OF RECEPTOR BINDING ASSAYS
1980 IDENTIFICATION OF RECEPTOR SUBTYPES
DELINEATION OF RECEPTOR PROFILES
1990 GENETIC TECHNOLOGY
TAILORING DRUGS TO RECEPTOR AFFINITIES
BY USING CELL LINES TRANSFECTED WITH CLONED RECEPTORS
FOR FINDING CHEMICALS WHICH FIT SPECIFIC RECEPTORS &
DESIGNING ADS WHICH COULD FIT DISEASES LIKE KEYS THEIR
LOCKS
2000 IF CURRENT CAPABILITY OF NEUROPHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
WOULD BE COMPLEMENTED WITH CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOL-
OGICAL RESEARCH (CODE-DD) IT WOULD OPEN UP A NEW PER-
SPECTIVE IN THE TR OF THE DIFFERENT FORMS OF DISEASE COVERED UP BY THE DG CATEGORY OF MAJOR DEPRESSION
Table 40
CONCLUSIONS
1. IN SPITE OF THE GROWING USE OF ADS D IS EXPECTED TO BECOME THE 2ND LEADING CAUSE OF DISABILITY BY 2020
2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE TREATMENT RESPONSIVE FORMS OF D IS THE
ESSENTIAL PREREQUISITE FOR REDUCING D-INDUCED DISABILIT
3. NPS PROVIDES A METHOD FOR RESOLVING THE HETEROGENEITY OF D &
FOR BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN NOSOLOGY AND THE GENES
4. CONSIDERING WHAT PHAMACOGENOMICS CAN OFFER INDUSTRY IS
PREPARING FOR A CHANGE IN WHICH GENETIC INFORMATION WILL DEFINE TREATMENT
5. IN THE NEW PERSPECTIVE EACH DIFFERENT FORM OF DISEASE SUBSUMED
UNDER DEPRESSION WILL GET ITS OWN "MAGIC BULLET"
Thomas A. Ban
July 21, 2016
Reply to Elemer Szabadi’s comment by Donald F. Klein
MARTIN KATZ: ONSET OF ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECT
Reply by Donald Klein on Comment by Elemer Szabadi
The debate between Martin Katz and myself centers on the question of how soon after antidepressant treatment is initiated does specific treatment benefit become manifest. The relevant measures used were weekly psychiatric scales, in placebo controlled clinical trials.
Dr. Szabadi (Szabadi et al., 1976) proposes an alternative measure: decreases in the speech pause time during automatic counting. His pilot study of four subjects during antidepressant treatment was promising. The article does not refer to the “small group” that showed effects during the first treatment week. Since there were only 4 subjects, one wonders at the size of this subgroup.
However, several studies found similar findings relating decreased speech pause time to improvement in depression. One mentioned that agitated depressions showed opposite effects. I was unable to find any placebo controlled clinical trial that used speech pause time as a dependent measure and I would appreciate such references.
Dr. Szabadi's simple, objective observation has been neglected. Any contribution to the Katz-Klein disagreement depends on its relative value to the usual scales for detecting clinical improvement. Conceivably, it might be measuring the degree of retardation, which is clinically difficult to evaluate but is an important component of remission.
If it were shown that only those drug treated patients with marked decreases in pause time during the first treatment week went on to substantial clinical improvement, this would be in harmony with Marty's views. Contrariwise, if many patients showed a later onset of substantial maintained improvement that would argue against the stand that early improvement can serve as a surrogate for eventual improvement.
I think the data generated by scales have already invalidated Katz's hypotheses. Nevertheless, such promising alternative measures are, in principle, welcome. Funding their evaluation is another issue.
Donald F. Klein
October 22, 2015