You are here: Controversies / Barry Blackwell: The lithium controversy: A historical autopsy / Thomas A. Ban’s comment on John Cade
Monday, 23.10.2017

Thomas A. Ban’s comment on John Cade

Thomas A. Ban’s comment on John Cade in response to interaction about Cade (based on interview with Bernard Carroll in 1998)

I did not know John Cade and I don’t have an answer to Barry Blackwell. But, from an interview conducted with Bernard Carroll on December 17, 1998 in Las Croabas, Puerto Rico, I learned that he “knew him well”. In his interview, Carroll told us that John Cade was one of his  teachers in psychiatry, his son, David, was in his medical school class and his other son, John, was two years ahead of them in medical school. “I knew the Cades and I knew John; in clinical psychiatry we were taught at the Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital, the inner city State hospital where John Cade was director. We would go, as medical students, to the auditorium on Saturday mornings where John Cade would teach us psychopathology and his style was very Kraepelinian. He was up on stage with two chairs, one for the patient and one for him.  An assistant would be hovering around and the patients would be lined up off stage. He would signal to stage right for a patient to be brought in and would say, in a very Edwardian authoritarian manner, ‘Ladies and gentlemen, I’m now going to demonstrate a patient with schizophrenia’. The patient would be brought and John Cade would put the schizophrenic patient through his hoops, send the patient off stage left, signal again to stage right and say, ‘Ladies and gentlemen, I’m now going to demonstrate a patient with mania so you should pay close attention to the differences between them’. His style was very autocratic and old fashioned, but in many ways, effective”.

“Then, in my psychiatry training, I had more encounters with Dr. Cade. I learned he had what can be called a divergent manner of thinking, a cognitive style with lateral and not always linear thinking. He published a paper in the Australian Medical Journal, on his theory of the etiology of schizophrenia. This, is in the late 1950's, was that schizophrenia was a disease that resulted from a deficiency of stone fruit such peaches and plums. An epidemiological study in the State of Victoria found that most acute schizophrenics were admitted to the receiving hospital from the densely populated parts of the city. They had the lowest density of fruit trees. That’s very similar in style to the thinking that led to his discovery of lithium.  He had this weird idea that some toxin in the urine of manic patients was responsible. He thought it was a urate salt. Needing a soluble urate salt, he got onto lithium urate. And his one good scientific question was to ask was it the urate or was it the lithium?”

“The dose was known, because lithium had been used for epilepsy and gout, so people knew that lithium was safe. John’s description of his IND process, shall I say, was that after he’d completed his guinea pig experiments he did a Phase 1 clinical trial on himself and the determining factor, when he treated himself with lithium for two weeks, was whether his wife, the long suffering Mrs. Cade, noted any difference. She did not notice, so he proceeded to treat a group of patients who were essentially chronic residents of the hospital.  Today, we would call those patients, looking at the case notes, rapid cycling bipolar. They were in and out of manic and depressive phases of bipolar illness and to everybody’s astonishment, they were all discharged within about four months of starting on lithium, so they truly were stabilized. John had complete freedom to do whatever he wanted in those days. There was no drug regulatory agency.”

Cade was medical superintendent of the hospital. “He lived on the hospital grounds.  I remember going to his house to visit with his sons, who were in medical school with me, going in by the back gate from the hospital grounds to the superintendent’s house. There was a basket on the gate that was replenished every day with vegetables from the patients’ garden for the consumption of the superintendent and his family”.

“The last time I saw John Cade was at a very important event.  It was the 1979 International Conference on Use of Lithium in New York and John was the featured person at that meeting, along with Schou. I remember being at the hotel, walking across the lobby the day the meeting was getting underway, and I saw John wandering around in a dazed and confused way. I knew immediately what the problem was. He was in his late seventies and terribly jet lagged. I went up to him and I said, ‘John, how are you’?  And, he said, ‘I’m alright, Barney, leave me alone’.  That was his usual style but I went on, ‘John, you look as though you’re not very well’.  He replied, ‘All I need is a little sleep’.  I asked ‘Where have you been’?  and he said, ‘I just got off the plane from Australia’. So I said, ‘John, do you mean to tell me you didn’t break the journey anywhere between Melbourne and New York’? He said, ‘No, I just flew straight here’. I admonished him but he was in a travelers’ delirium with severe jet lag and disorientation. So we got him to his room and he slept that off was back to his happy self for the rest of the meeting.  I take credit for helping to get John settled down in time for his public appearance”.

 

Reference:

Bernard Carroll. Interviews by Leo E. Hollister and Thomas A. Ban. In: Ban TA. (series editor). An Oral History of Neuropsychopharacology. The First Fifty Years. Peer Intreviews. Volume 5. (Neuropsychopharmacology. Volume editor: Samuel Gershon). Brentwood: American College of Neuropsychopharmacology; 2011, pp.85-102.

 

Thomas A. Ban
June 18, 2015